Investigator Canvas · Interactive Demo

Investigate fraud rings
on a single canvas.

ZIC Engine turns case data into an interactive relationship graph with AI-assisted triage, tamper-evident evidence, and a complete audit trail — so an analyst moves from raw data to a defensible decision in one place.

1
Unified Canvas
4
Risk Metrics
SHA-256
Evidence Integrity
Full
Audit Trail

One screen, from first signal to final decision.

ZIC Engine presents the entities and transactions in a case as an interactive graph alongside an investigator workspace — no switching between tools to read a ring, check an entity, or record a decision. Upstream, real-time decisions come from the Zarelva Signal Engine, which hands high-risk events to ZIC as analyst-ready cases.

01
📥

Import

Load entities and transactions from CSV or a saved case bundle. The data validates and renders straight into the graph.

02
🕸

Detect

Surface coordinated fraud rings and the cross-links between them from connectivity in the data.

03
🔎

Investigate

Spotlight a ring, drill into entities, resolve duplicates, and weigh an explainable AI recommendation.

04

Decide

Record a standardised outcome, backed by verified evidence and a complete audit trail.

Built for ring analysis, not just alerts.

Everything an analyst needs to work a multi-entity case from one workspace.

📊

Visual investigation

See rings, entities, and money flows on one canvas; click any ring to isolate it.

🕸

Automated ring detection

Group connected parties into candidate rings and surface the links between them.

🔗

Entity resolution

Identify likely duplicate parties and merge them into a single canonical entity.

🤖

AI-assisted triage

A recommendation, model confidence, and the explainable risk factors behind a score.

🔑

Tamper-evident evidence

Hash attachments with SHA-256 and verify integrity on demand.

📜

Complete audit trail

Every material action is recorded, so a case can be reconstructed from the record alone.

Four measures, kept distinct.

ZIC Engine never conflates severity with certainty. Each measure answers a different question.

Overall Case Risk

Case-level severity (0–100), driven by the highest-risk entity. A prioritisation signal — not a verdict.

Model Confidence

How certain the AI is in its recommendation. A measure of certainty — not of risk.

Ring detection confidence

Per ring, how strongly a cluster reads as coordinated. A prompt to review — not proof.

Risk factors

The itemised signals behind a score, so the reasoning stays transparent and reviewable.

Knowledge retrieval & investigation memory, built in.

ZIC doesn't just display a case — it remembers, correlates, and grounds every decision in evidence and regulation. No separate tools, no copy-pasting between systems.

🔌

Signal correlation

Signals from devices, transactions and identities are correlated across the case automatically — patterns surface without manual cross-referencing.

🧠

Investigation memory

Past cases, dispositions and confirmed patterns stay retrievable — a returning fraud ring is recognised, not re-investigated from scratch.

📂

Evidence retrieval

Every piece of evidence in a case is indexed and retrievable in context, with SHA-256 integrity intact — findable at decision time, not buried in folders.

📚

Regulatory knowledge retrieval

Decisions can be grounded against the applicable regulatory guidance — retrieved with provenance, never fabricated.

📝

Explainable decision generation

The closing narrative is generated from the case's own signals, evidence and citations — a written rationale an auditor can follow line by line.

Evidence you can prove. Actions you can trace.

Two things make a case easy to defend in review.

🔑

SHA-256 evidence

Files are fingerprinted on attachment; verify integrity on demand to confirm nothing has changed.

📜

Append-only audit

Imports, flags, merges, accept/override, and the final decision are all recorded automatically.

⚖️

Standardised disposition

Every case closes with an outcome and a rationale, mapped to a clear decision framework.

A working demo — with honest boundaries.

We would rather you trust the tool than be dazzled by it.

  •  Synthetic data only.  Every name, account, and transaction in the demo is fictitious.
  •  Evaluation vs production.  In this demo, selected AI narrative and enrichment content is illustrative; a production deployment is configured against your own data, models, and intelligence sources.
  •  What is real.  Ring detection, entity resolution, SHA-256 evidence verification, the audit trail, and case save / export work as shown.
  •  Analyst responsibility.  Findings should be corroborated against authoritative systems before any regulatory filing or customer action.

Open the canvas.
Work a case end to end.

The live demo runs in your browser. Import the sample data, run ring detection, investigate the graph, verify a piece of evidence, and record a decision — the full investigation loop.

Launch the Live Demo →

Discuss a deployment

📧 hello@zarelva.com

Or Book a 30-min Call →
  • Live, in-browser investigator canvas
  • Sample fraud-ring case included
  • Operating Guide (PDF) download
  • Ring detection & entity resolution
  • SHA-256 evidence verification
  • Explainable AI recommendation
  • Full audit trail & case export
  • Built by an independent fraud practice